Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT is an open-based journal research that accommodates research of Informatics Engineering, Computer Engineering and information Systems.

The scope encompasses the Informatics Engineering, Computer Engineering and information Systems., but not limited to, the following scope:

1. Information Systems
  • Information management
  • e-Government
  • E-business and e-Commerce
  • Spatial Information Systems
  • Geographical Information Systems
  • IT Governance and Audits
  • IT Service Management
  • IT Project Management
  • Information System Development
  • Research Methods of Information Systems
  • Software Quality Assurance

 

2. Computer Engineering

  • Intelligent Systems
  • Network Protocol and Management
  • Robotic
  • Computer Security
  • Information Security and Privacy
  • Information Forensics
  • Network Security
  • Protection Systems

 

3. Informatics Engineering
  • Software Engineering
  • Soft Computing
  • Data Mining
  • Information Retrieval
  • Multimedia Technology
  • Mobile Computing
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Games Programming
  • Computer Vision
  • Image Processing, Embedded System
  • Augmented/ Virtual Reality
  • Image Processing
  • Speech Recognition


 

Section Policies

Teknik Informatika

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Every article that goes to the editorial staff will be selected through Initial Review processes by Editorial Board. Then, the articles will be sent to the Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer and will go to the next selection by Blind peer review Process. After that, the articles will be returned to the authors to revise. These processes take a month for a maximum time. In the each manuscript, Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer will be rated from the substantial and technical aspects.

Mitra Bebestari/ peer reviewer that collaboration with Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT (JPIT) is the experts in the computer science area and issues around it. They were experienced in the prestigious journal management and publication that was spread around the national and abroad.

 

Publication Frequency

JPIT (Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT) is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year (January, May and September).

January Edition:
Submission Deadline: 30 November
Notification of review results: 30 December
Journal Published : 30 January

May Edition:
Submission Deadline: 30 March
Notification of review result: 30 April
Journal Published: 30 May

September Edition:
Submission Deadline: 30 July
Notification of review result: 30 August
Journal Published: 30 September

 

Open Access Policy

Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT is a fully open access journal. Articles are published under a CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution) licence. Articles are freely available to everyone to read and reuse immediately upon publication, provided attribution to the author is given. Publication is funded by article publication charges (APCs).

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Plagiarism Policy

Editorial Team Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT acknowledges that plagiarism is unacceptable and therefore establishes the following policy which states specific actions (penalties) if plagiarism is identified in an article submitted for publication in the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT .

Definition:
Plagiarism is an act intentionally or unintentionally in obtaining or trying to obtain credit or value for a scientific work, by quoting part or all of another party's scientific works and/or works that are recognized as scientific works, without stating the source precisely and adequately.

For that, then:

Articles must be original, never before published, and not in the process of waiting for publication elsewhere. Material taken verbally from other sources needs to be clearly identified so that it differs from the original text.

If plagiarism is identified, the Editor-in-Chief is responsible for reviewing the article and will approve actions according to the level of plagiarism detected, with the following guidelines:

Plagiarism Rate
1. Plagiarized some short sentences from other articles without mentioning the source. Action: The author is given a warning and a request to change the text and quote properly.
2. Plagiarized most of the other articles without proper citation and did not mention the source. Action: The submitted article is rejected for publication in the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT and the author may be sanctioned for not being allowed publication in the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT.

All article authors are responsible for the contents of the articles they submit because they all sign the Letter of Originality of the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT. If the article is classified as plagiarism, then all authors will be subject to the same action.

If the author is proven to have submitted a manuscript to the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT by simultaneously sending it to other journals, and this overlap is found during the reviewer process or after publication, then action is given according to point 2 above.

If plagiarism is found outside the rules above, the editor of the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT has the right to impose sanctions according to the policies of the editorial team.

 

Publication Ethics

Duties of Authors

1. Reporting Standards:
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.
2. Data Access and Retention:
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.
3. Originality and Plagiarism:
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
4. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication:
An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.
5. Acknowledgement of Sources:
Proper acknowledgement of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
6. Authorship of the Paper:
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
7. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest:
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
8. Fundamental errors in published works:
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
9. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects:
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Duties of Editors

1. Fair Play: 
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

2. Confidentiality: 
The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

4. Publication Decisions
The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
5. Review of Manuscripts: 
The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organise and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers
1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
2. Promptness: 
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process
3. Standards of Objectivity: 
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
4. Confidentiality: 
Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorised by the editor.
5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: 
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
6. Acknowledgement of Sources: 
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

 

Copyright and License Statement

All articles published by Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. This permits anyone to copy, redistribute, remix, transmit and adapt the work provided the original work and source is appropriately cited.

Copyright :

Authors who publish their manuscripts in this Journal agree to the following conditions:

The copyright for any article in the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT is fully held by the author under a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license.

  1. The author acknowledges that Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT has the right to publish for the first time with a Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0
  2. Authors can enter writings separately, arrange non-exclusive distribution of manuscripts that have been published in this journal into other versions (eg sent to the author's institutional repository, publication in a book, etc.), by acknowledging that the manuscript has been published for the first time in the Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT

Licence :

Jurnal Informatika: Jurnal Pengembangan IT published under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License / CC BY 4.0 This license permits anyone to copy and redistribute this material in any form or format, compose, modify, and make derivative works of this material for any purpose, including commercial purposes, so long as they include credit to the Author of the original work.