Evaluasi User Experience Google Lens pada Pengguna Baru Menggunakan Metode Cognitive Walkthrough

Luky Vianika Sari, Rizqi Praimadi Rosalin, Agus Mulyanto, Ahmad Zamzami, Tatang Juliyanto

Abstract


New users often experience difficulties using Google Lens due to a lack of familiarity with Augmented Reality (AR) technology. This study aims to evaluate the usability of Google Lens using the Cognitive Walkthrough method, focusing on three main task scenarios: text translation, object identification, and barcode scanning. A total of 60 respondents participated in the study, with data collected through a Likert-based questionnaire (1–5) and direct observation of user interactions. The quantitative analysis results showed that Google Lens obtained an average score of 3.5 for satisfaction, 3.8 for efficiency, and 3.2 for ease of navigation. Evaluation per scenario showed the highest success rate for barcode scanning (92%), followed by text translation (85%), while object identification had the lowest success rate (78%). Qualitative findings revealed that less intuitive navigation, unclear function icons, a lack of initial guidance, and limited object identification accuracy were the main obstacles for new users. Based on these results, this study recommends several improvements, including optimizing the interface design, adding descriptive labels to icons, providing personalization features, and developing interactive tutorials for new users. With these recommendations, it is hoped that Google Lens can become an application that is easier to learn, more efficient, and provides a more satisfying experience, while also enriching the literature related to usability evaluation of Augmented Reality-based applications. 

Keywords


Augmented Reality; Cognitive Walkthrough; Google Lens; User Evaluation; Usability.

Full Text:

References


K. Dargan, S., Bansal, S., Kumar, M., Mittal, A., & Kumar, “Augmented reality: A comprehensive review,” Arch. Comput. Methods Eng., vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 1057–1080, 2023.

A. Usmaedi, U., Fatmawati, P. Y., & Karisman, “Pengembangan media pembelajaran berbasis teknologi aplikasi augmented reality dalam meningkatkan proses pengajaran siswa sekolah dasar.,” J. Educ. FKIP UNMA, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 489–499, 2020.

F. Villagran-Vizcarra, D. C., Luviano-Cruz, D., Pérez-Domínguez, L. A., Méndez-González, L. C., & Garcia-Luna, “Applications analyses, challenges and development of augmented reality in education, industry, marketing, medicine, and entertainment.,” Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 5, p. 2766, 2023.

F. J. López-Belmonte, J., Moreno-Guerrero, A. J., López-Núñez, J. A., & Hinojo-Lucena, “Augmented reality in education. A scientific mapping in Web of Science.1860-1874.,” Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1860–1874, 2023.

K. Tan, Y., Xu, W., Li, S., & Chen, “Augmented and virtual reality (AR/VR) for education and training in the AEC industry: A systematic review of research and applications.,” Buildings, vol. 12, no. 10, p. 1529, 2022.

R. C. Marpaung, F., Aulia, F., & Nabila, “Computer Vision Dan Pengolahan Citra Digital.,” 2022.

A. C. Cho, H., Pham, M. T., Leonard, K. N., & Urban, “A systematic literature review on image information needs and behaviors,” J. Doc., vol. 78, no. 2, pp. 207–227, 2022.

H. Basri et al., “Faktor yang mempengaruhi antar muka pengguna pada aplikasi brainly berbasis mobile,” vol. 15, pp. 15–27, 2024.

A. A. Rochim, “Kecerdasan Buatan: Resiko, Tantangan Dan Penggunaan Bijak Pada Dunia Pendidikan,” Antroposen J. Soc. Stud. Hum., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2024, doi: 10.33830/antroposen.v3i1.6780.

P. Annisa, “Penerapan Teknologi Google Lens dan QR Code pada Tanaman Pertanian,” Dst, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 240–245, 2023, doi: 10.47709/dst.v3i2.3130.

S. P. A. Ramadani and T. Y. E. Siswono, “MATHE dunesa,” J. Ilm. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 59–66, 2021, doi: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v13n3.p1000-1012.

O. Vaherdi, H. M. Az-zahra, and A. Syawli, “Evaluasi Usability Antarmuka Pengguna pada Aplikasi Mobile E-Open Disdukcapil Kota Bekasi Dengan Metode Usability Testing dan Heuristic Evaluation,” vol. 9, no. 4, 2025.

N. T. Sirajuddin and A. A. Wahditiya, “Pelatihan Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Canva Bagi Guru SMP 4 Bantimurung Kabupaten Maros,” J. Pustaka Mitra (Pusat Akses Kaji. Mengabdi Terhadap Masyarakat), vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 44–54, 2024, doi: 10.55382/jurnalpustakamitra.v4i2.699.

W. Basiroen, V. J., Putra, I. N. A. S., Judijanto, L., Anggara, I. G. A. S., Negoro, A. T., Sutarwiyasa, I. K., ... & Wijaya, Dasar-Dasar Desain Komunikasi Visual (DKV). 2024.

M. Ramadhani, S. F., & Kom, Singularity: Interaksi Manusia dan Mesin dalam Teknologi Informasi. Takaza Innovatix Labs., 2024.

Interaction Design Foundation - IxDF, “How to Conduct a Cognitive Walkthrough.,” Interact. Des. Found. - IxDF, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/how-to-conduct-a-cognitive-walkthrough

P. Hamdanuddinsyah, M. H., Hanafi, M., & Sukmasetya, “Perancangan UI/UX Aplikasi Buku Online Mizanstore Berbasis Mobile Menggunakan User Centered Design.,” J. Inf. Syst. Res., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1464–1475, 2023.

M. Georgsson, N. Staggers, E. Årsand, and A. Kushniruk, “Employing a user-centered Cognitive Walkthrough to evaluate a mHealth diabetes self-management application: A case study and beginning method validation,” J. Biomed. Inform., vol. 91, no. August 2018, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103110.

M. Farzandipour, E. Nabovati, H. Tadayon, and M. Sadeqi Jabali, “Usability evaluation of a nursing information system by applying Cognitive Walkthrough method,” Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 152, no. August 2020, p. 104459, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104459.

R. Fitria, “Integrating Heuristic Evaluation and Cognitive Walkthrough in Usability Evaluation of Mobile Application,” J. Artif. Intell. Eng. Appl., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 667–670, 2024, doi: 10.59934/jaiea.v3i3.488.

E. Halkiopoulos, C., & Gkintoni, “Leveraging AI in e-learning: Personalized learning and adaptive assessment through cognitive neuropsychology,” A Syst. Anal. Electron., vol. 13, no. 18, p. 3762, 2024.

I. Doumanis and D. Economou, “Using Cognitive Walkthrough and Hybrid Prototyping to Gather User Requirements in Early Design Virtual Reality Prototypes,” Commun. Comput. Inf. Sci., vol. 1044, pp. 234–246, 2019, doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23089-0_18.

S. Ntoa, “Usability and User Experience Evaluation in Intelligent Environments: A Review and Reappraisal,” Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact., vol. 41, no. 5, pp. 2829–2858, 2025, doi: 10.1080/10447318.2024.2394724.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30591/jpit.v10i3.8651

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

JPIT INDEXED BY

  
  

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.